What can be a consequence of operating without proper authorization during a signal failure?

Operating without proper authorization during a signal failure can lead to legal repercussions for the company. When a dispatcher or operator bypasses established protocols, particularly in the context of safety-critical systems like railway signaling, they expose the company to potential liability. This is because such actions can result in accidents, injuries, or damage to property. Regulatory bodies impose strict operational guidelines to ensure safety, and failing to adhere to these can have serious consequences, including fines, sanctions, or even criminal charges against responsible individuals. Upholding safety regulations not only protects passengers and employees but also safeguards the company’s legal standing and reputation in the industry.

The other options do not align with the reality of operating without authorization. Increased efficiency in operations typically relies on following established protocols rather than circumventing them. Enhanced passenger satisfaction generally results from safe and reliable service, rather than risk-prone actions. As for the notion of no significant impact, it overlooks the inherent dangers associated with unauthorized actions during signal failures, which can have grave safety implications.